CIVIL SOCIETY
Marianna Grigoryan
6/17/08
Print this article
Email this article
Plans for a large-scale opposition rally on June 20 are sparking concerns about the likelihood of fresh violence on the eve of a critical vote in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe about Armenias efforts to reverse the effects of its March 1 crackdown on opposition protestors.
As during this years presidential election campaign, the bone of contention centers on a question of venue. The four-hour demonstration, organized by ex-President Levon Ter-Petrosians political movement, is expected to be held at 6pm on Liberty Square in downtown Yerevan, the preferred location for opposition protests.
But the Yerevan city government has refused to authorize a rally in the Square, a location within easy walking distance of key government offices.
The opposition charges politics is the reason for the refusal. The city says it is children.
An afternoon entertainment for Yerevan youngsters has been scheduled for the same day at the same location, and will last until the late evening, Kamo Movsisian, head of the city department for Culture, Sports and Youth Issues, told EurasiaNet. "Attractions for children will be set up all over the square that day and its illogical to think there is a political underpinning in that," Movsisian stated.
As an alternative, Ter-Petrosians Pan-National Movement proposed the area in front of Yerevans centrally located Institute for Ancient Manuscripts – the regular back-up site for opposition gatherings – but the proposal was denied. City government representatives could not be reached to explain their decision. The opposition claims that it was told that the government fears that unrest could break out at the site.
Instead, the city offered Ter-Petrosian supporters a square near Hrazdan Stadium, the countrys largest football arena, about five kilometers from downtown Yerevan.
Arguing that protestors have been banished to the boondocks, one Ter-Petrosian supporter terms the citys proposal "absurd," and asserts that it is "the peoples right" to hold a rally on Liberty Square.
"If ... the application for a rally adjacent to Matenadaran [Institute for Ancient Manuscripts] is refused based on the possibility of causing disturbances, then cant they be instigated near Hrazdan Stadium as well?" asked Levon Zurabian, a senior member of the ex-presidents Pan-National Movement. "A rally ... cant be held in an isolated place like Hrazdan Stadium."
One pro-opposition political analyst attributes the governments decision to fear.
"They are afraid of the movement that has begun," argued Aghasi Yenokian. "[T]he authorities faced a dilemma of either entering into a dialogue with the opposition or keeping their rigid stance. They opted for the second, and that will no doubt lead to a major explosion."
Arguably, a degree of skittishness among some government supporters is noticeable. Parliamentarian Davit Harutiunian, head of the Armenian delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, told reporters on June 13 that he worries that the demonstrations may mean more clashes.
"We dont have specially trained detachments with the proper equipment to prevent further negative developments with minimal damage," Harutiunian elaborated. "And there is a concern about that in every sober mind."
As have other opposition members, Ter-Petrosian coalition member Zarubian, however, put "full responsibility" for any lack of order at the June 20 rally on the government. "The June 20 rally will take place, and it will take place with Levon Ter-Petrosian," he declared.
Meanwhile, President Serzh Sarkisian, in what is becoming a favored communication technique, has already delivered a televised caution to police. Law enforcement officers, Sarkisian stressed, share the blame for the violence on March 1.
"If the government is guilty, this means that the police are guilty too," he said. "For the first time, the police had to deal with a deliberate plan to stage massive unrest ... I am sure that if the combat readiness of the police were at the highest level, it would have been possible to avoid the killing of eight citizens and two policemen ..."
The oppositions right to rally is not in question, Sarkisian added to reporters on hand for the meeting.
"Rallies have always been and will always be held in our country. I have stated many times I will always defend our citizens right to express their protest ... Let them go hold their rally," he said.
But some Yerevan residents wonder whether Sarkisians target audience was the law enforcement agencies as much as it was PACE. On June 23, the body is scheduled to discuss whether or not to annul Armenias voting rights based on its progress in meeting a series of conditions, including removing restrictions on public demonstrations.
PACE co-rapporteurs Georges Colombier and John Prescott spent June 16-17 in Yerevan meeting with government officials, pro-government and opposition politicians, as well as the families of those still detained in connection with the March 1 crackdown.
The government, however, can argue that it has made progress in meeting two additional PACE conditions. As requested, a parliamentary committee has been established to investigate the events of March 1, and a so-called Public Council set up to stimulate dialogue between government, opposition and non-government representatives.
Opposition members of the Council, however, are limited to representatives of the relatively weak and small Christian Democratic Union, National Democratic Party of Armenia and the National Democrats Bloc. Representatives from the Ter-Petrosian coalition have refused to take part.
Their absence, though, has done nothing to discourage the governments official conviction that it is set on the right path. A spokesperson for Sarkisian noted on June 16 that "[d]emocratic reforms are not limited to the implementation of the resolutions provisions and will be continuous," news agencies reported.
Editor’s Note: Marianna Grigoryan is a freelance reporter for the ArmeniaNow.com weekly in Yerevan.
Posted June 17, 2008 © Eurasianet
http://www.eurasianet.org
|
The Central Eurasia Project aims, through its website,
meetings, papers, and grants, to foster a more informed
debate about the social, political and economic
developments of the Caucasus and Central Asia.
It is a program of the Open Society
Institute-New York. The Open Society Institute-New
York is a private operating and grantmaking foundation
that promotes the development of open societies around
the world by supporting educational, social, and legal
reform, and by encouraging alternative
approaches to complex and controversial issues.
The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily
represent the position of the Open Society Institute and
are the sole responsibility of the author or
authors.
|
|